Reasons against embryonic stem cell research

Stem cell research—why is it regarded as a threat?

In general, I think we ought to give the benefit of the doubt to our ability to use new technologies. Furthermore, because a skin biopsy to obtain somatic cells is relatively noninvasive, there are fewer concerns about risks to donors compared with oocyte donation.

The Case Against Embryonic Stem Cell Research: An Interview with Yuval Levin

Use of such older lines is appropriate because it would be unreasonable to expect physicians to comply with standards that had not yet been developed Hastings Cent Rep And so, to my mind, the argument at the heart of the embryonic stem cell debate is the argument about human equality.

However, payment to oocyte donors in excess of reasonable out-of-pocket expenses is controversial, and jurisdictions have conflicting policies that may also be internally inconsistent 27 After 14 days the embryo can no longer split to form twins.

If the embryos possessed the same moral status as children or adults, the creators would be charged with murder or as accomplices to murder.

But this depends on the long-term administration of drugs to treat a number of conditions including high blood pressure, diabetes, rheumatoid arthritis and asthma. So which moral principle should have the upper hand in this situation? For the benefit of what? Bush vetoed a bill to ensure the continuation and expansion of human embryonic stem hES cell research in the USA; including the proposition to allow discarded embryos created for IVF to be utilized as sources for new hES cell lines.

It forces us to choose between two moral principles: As discussed previously, in other research settings, research participants often fail to understand the information in detailed consent forms In a July statement, bioethicists, scientists and legal scholars said they objected to embryonic stem cell research on the grounds that such research is both unethical and unnecessary.

ART clinics can readily discuss donation for research with oocyte donors during visits for oocyte stimulation and retrieval. For example, large-scale genome sequencing may evoke concerns about privacy and confidentiality. To obtain embryonic stem cells, the early embryo has to be destroyed.

Harvard University Press Assisted reproductive technologies. The embryo has full moral status from fertilization onwards Either the embryo is viewed as a person whilst it is still an embryo, or it is seen as a potential person. Democracy should therefore respect differences in opinion regarding morality.

Even then, the probability that embryos used for in vitro fertilization will develop into full-term successful births is low. Confidentiality of donor information. Federal funds would not pay for the creation of embryos for the purpose of establishing stem cell lines.

Survival of the fittest—an unfortunate phrase in any case—simply describes those who are fittest to survive under those selective pressures that exist at any one time.

This extreme utilisation of the personhood argument, if taken literally, could in effect legitimise infanticide and potentially the killing of other individuals deemed to lack the capacity to value their existence such as those with severe developmental or learning disabilities.

In addition to this philosophical argument, one should consider that there are also cogent biological reasons for opposing reproductive cloning using cell nuclear transfer. Certainly, death is regarded as having occurred well before every individual cell of the body has died.Embryonic stem cell research is a hot topic that seems to pit anti-abortion conservatives against pro-abortion liberals.

The conservatives claim that there are better alternatives to embryonic stem cells, while the liberals claim that conservatives are blocking research that will provide cures to many tragic diseases. Examining the ethics of embryonic stem cell research Following the recent passage by both houses of Congress of the Stem Cell Research Enhancement Act ofwhich would permit federal funding of research using donated surplus embryonic stem cells from fertility clinics, the president has once again threatened a veto.

Arguments in Support of Embryonic Stem Cell Funding

Oct 29,  · Scientists largely agree that stem cells may hold a key to the treatment, and even cure, of many serious medical conditions. But while the use of adult stem cells is widely accepted, many religious groups and others oppose stem cell research involving the use and destruction of human embryos.

Aug 09,  · At the same time, many scientists say that embryonic stem cell research is necessary to unlock the promise of stem cell therapies since embryonic stem cells can.

Examining the ethics of embryonic stem cell research which would permit federal funding of research using donated surplus embryonic stem cells from fertility clinics, the president has once again threatened a veto.

SCL: What are the main arguments for and against embryonic stem cell research? MS: Proponents argue that embryonic stem.

The Cases For and Against Stem Cell Research

Those against embryonic stem cell research argue that funding should be used to greatly expand adult stem research, to circumvent the many moral issues involving the .

Reasons against embryonic stem cell research
Rated 4/5 based on 94 review